Which Harry Potter Film is Least true to the book?

Hello Friends,

When adapting a book to film it is Undeniable that things are going to be cut.But it's necessary to figuring out what to cut without loosing the story.
I heard that harry potter films also have these cut off problems.


In your opinion, Which Harry Potter film is least true to the book?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bhavya

Hello Friends,

When adapting a book to film it is Undeniable that things are going to be cut.But it's necessary to figuring out what to cut without loosing the story.
I heard that harry potter films also have these cut off problems.


In your opinion, Which Harry Potter film is least true to the book?

---

tbh, all the movies say the 10% from the books. So I can't clearly say which one is least true. Almost all are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shana

tbh, all the movies say the 10% from the books. So I can't clearly say which one is least true. Almost all are.

---

So your saying ,If we didn't read the books ,We missed 90% of the story

I prefer watching movies rather than reading books. Only reason, it saves a lot of time. And I agree that books are certainly better than movies in all aspect. Now coming to the point, I consider Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire as the least true as the book talks more about Lord Voldemort and his true nature is revealed clearly by J.K.Rowling whereas the movie is more about the tournament and also Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (though I like all HP movies) :/ Additional info, there are certain factors in HP movie which is mind blowing. If you remember the title credits, only the first two parts had colored fonts and reason being this was directed by Chris Columbus (who directed Home Alone). Also, they were the most colorful parts (childhood of Harry) among all 7. From the third part, all the title credits are in dark tone and no quidditch matches too :/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by subasan

I prefer watching movies rather than reading books. Only reason, it saves a lot of time. And I agree that books are certainly better than movies in all aspect. Now coming to the point, I consider Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire as the least true as the book talks more about Lord Voldemort and his true nature is revealed clearly by J.K.Rowling whereas the movie is more about the tournament and also Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (though I like all HP movies) :/ Additional info, there are certain factors in HP movie which is mind blowing. If you remember the title credits, only the first two parts had colored fonts and So you love to reason being this was directed by Chris Columbus (who directed Home Alone). Also, they were the most colorful parts (childhood of Harry) among all 7. From the third part, all the title credits are in dark tone and no quidditch matches too :/

---

So you love to watch the stories visually rather than reading, Thanks for sharing this information about Harry Potter movies.